If an individual is looking to business-incorporation/”>form a new business, they may want to consider forming a Limited Liability Company. This type of business structure is similar to a corporation but is less formal, more flexible and offers several benefits, including personal liability protection, for its owners.

What is an LLC?

A “Limited Liability Company” (LLC) is a hybrid between a partnership and a corporation. It has the operating flexibility and “pass through” tax treatment of a partnership with the limited liability for its “members” accorded to corporate shareholders. “While an LLC is a business entity, it is best to think of it as an unincorporated association,” said Anthony Spotora, an extremely experienced business attorney. “Although sometimes incorrectly referred to as Limited Liability Corporations, they are in fact not corporations.” See California Corporations Code, Title 2.6.

Further Benefits

LLCs are highly attractive to some because of the flexibility in tax choices. LLC business ventures qualify for a single layer of taxation, which prevents ownership from being double-taxed under the corporate tax structure.

“However, LLCs may also elect to be taxed under a corporate tax structure if they wish,” Spotora advised. “In fact, the full list of taxation choices for LLCs are as a sole proprietor, a partnership and either an S- or C- Corporation.”

LLCs also often require much less administrative paperwork and record-keeping than do corporations. The laws also allow LLCs to customize the rules for how the LLC is best operated.

Drawbacks

Some people feel that LLCs do have disadvantages, however.

In California and a handful of other states, LLCs must pay a franchise or capital values tax on the business.

LLC’s in California must pay an annual tax to the state’s Franchise Tax Board. The fee is $800 per year, though if the LLC’s net annual income exceeds $250,000, then there will be an additional fee that must be paid, too.

Also, some people believe LLCs have a more difficult time raising financial capital because investors may be more comfortable investing funds into corporate firms.

If a person is considering forming a Limited Liability Company or other business entity, it is important for them to speak with a knowledgeable attorney. Anthony Spotora is a Los Angeles business attorney who specializes in incorporation and can guide you on the best strategy for your business.

You can visit our blog to learn more about corporate formation and other topics in business law, including the impact of RULLCA, California’s 2014 revision of the laws governing LLCs.

This past spring, one of the Department heads we work with at FremantleMedia invited us to attend the live performance of an “American Idol” taping. This taping, or rather, pop-hysteria, led to conversations relating to the management of those that do not win the title of the next “American Idol”.

Now we all know that the winner is locked into a contract with Music Label/Management Company, “19”, but what of the other near-Idols? Who gets to run their proverbial show? This question, in accompaniment to some of the surrounding conversations and eager talent managers, reminded us of a piece of legalese that has come up time and time again in our practice. The issue: Managers vs. Agents.

Whether you are a bona fide Talent Manager, a Stage Mom, or the girlfriend who listened to her boyfriend’s band play one night at the local pub and decided to serve as its manager, you should understand the differences between the roles that managers and agents are legally entitled to play. . . for your own good!

For starters, agents are licensed by the state they work in and most commonly earn their money by negotiating deals for their clients. Typically, they also enter into a client agreement which is, in pertinent part, regulated by industry labor unions such as, the Screen Actors Guild (SAG), the Writers Guild of America (WGA) and, the Directors Guild of America (DGA). Through these regulated agreements, the commissions that agents charge their clients are legally bound to a prescribed percentage. Furthermore, it should be noted that agents may not serve as a producer on their clients’ projects.

On the other hand, managers are not commission-regulated, do not need a license to ‘manage’ and, can charge their clients 15% or more. . . and often do. Moreover, managers may produce film or television if they wish to and so of course, they are also afforded the ‘glamour’ element in that they might find themselves in the spotlight one Award evening with an Emmy or an Oscar in tow.

In light of these representative differences, and as you might imagine, the ever-evolving entertainment industry has shifted gears over the years to accommodate and benefit from both of these roles. Without surprise to anyone, these specialty services have impacted not only the way talent pursues work, but the manner in which movies and television are actually made.

So what’s the big deal!? We all have a job to do, right!?

Well, one common issue arises from infuriated agents who argue that managers who attach themselves to their clients’ projects as producers are not legitimate producers and are consequently driving up production costs. Subsequent to such a contention, agents have put pressure on industry guilds by lobbying to either deregulate agents, or regulate managers. And, while no exact resolution has been reached to date, SAG has begun to pay closer attention to the black letter law and has consequently cracked down on the procurement of employment by managers for their clients. On the what you ask? On getting the talent a gig!

In California, Labor Code Sec. 1700.4(a) defines “talent agency” as “a person or corporation who engages in the occupation of procuring, offering, promising, or attempting to procure employment of engagements for an artist.” Moreover, Sec. 1700.5 provides that “[n]o person shall engage in or carry on the occupation of a talent agency without first procuring a license…from the Labor Commissioner.”

Therefore, ATTENTION ALL MANAGERS: Be Weary of The Services You Provide!

Procuring employment for your artist-client is not only illegal without proper licensing but, should you attempt to collect any unpaid fees, you can rightfully not only be denied those monies for having performed a service you were not licensed to perform but, you can also be ordered to return any fees already received!

So what’s the bottom-line? Both forms of talent reps are still widely used and widely needed in the ‘industry’. However, it is important that Managers know their role in their clients’ professional lives and also know the potential consequences they may face if they knowingly (or even unknowingly) provide services reserved for licensed Agents.